Skip to main content

Data that Deceives

 

Yesterday, an interesting tidbit was highlighted in turfshowtimes.com “Rams News…” Mathew Stafford had the highest 3rd down conversion rate in the NFL.  The Rams touted Stafford “as the single most productive quarterback when it comes to converting on third downs.”  Stafford deserves kudos for his 2021 accomplishments, this one included.  However, while this is a useful metric indicative of past success, it has been shown for a long time it is not a repeatable skill. 

Performance on third down plays a huge role in team success... Third down success keeps the offense on the field and the opponents defense reeling. It clearly maintains drives for the inevitable goal of scoring. While it’s an important aspect of evaluating a quarterback's past performance relative to wins, it's not a skill. QB’s who do well on third down over the long term are the quarterbacks who also do well on first and second downs.

Football Outsiders has shown that teams that play significantly better on third down than they do on first and second down in a given year tend to see that third-down performance regress back to their performance on the first two downs in the following season.  Similarly, teams that underperform on third down tend to see a positive bump the year after.  Football Outsiders refers to this as “the 3rd down rebound effect.”  One needs to evaluate overall quarterback success regardless of down.  Weighing 3rd down performance to forecast future 3rd down success is not appropriate prognostication.

Eagles Lessons: Where have we seen this before?  In the Eagles Super Bowl (2017) season, Carson Wentz was a 3rd and long magician- 44-for-71 (62%) for 727 yards, 7 TD’s,  117.5 passer rating.  On 3rd/4th & short, he was the NFL’s best (20-of-24 {83%} for 186 yards, 5 TD’s, 138.4 passer rating). 

Wentz’s third down success in 2017 hid an uncomfortable truth… Before third down, Wentz was a bottom 10 starter, with an EPA/play (EPA, Expected Points added, is a key stat in Football Analytics) that was 23rd.  His great success on 3rd downs delivered an MVP-like season, but, as Football Outsiders explains, it was not repeatable!

2020 was a similar aberration for Wentz statistically as things fell apart around him and he played poorly.  His other seasons, including 2018-2019 and his 2021 season with the Colts have been “OK.” 

Carson Wentz fooled us in 2017.  His subsequent injuries and reversion to the norm statistically on 3rd downs pulled his play into the middling area for QB’s.  Wentz will not be a world beater for the Commanders.  He’ll be an “OK” QB, likely better given health and the right players around him. 

As for Stafford?  He’s a good QB, but expect similar regression to the mean on 3rd down success next year!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Derek Stingley Jr.

  First round draft prospect Derek Stingley Jr. is a paradox.   The LSU cornerback had an incredible freshman season, a clear top of the 1 st round talent even that young.   But since… not so much.   A combination of injuries and COVID have forced his stock down in this year’s NFL draft. Injuries have limited him to 10 games over 2 seasons since the 15 he played his freshman year.   And based upon past performance, opposing offenses have shied away from attacking him, thus yielding less tape to evaluate: The Good (from his freshman tape): He had speed, quickness and recovery speed. He had great coverage technique in breaking with opposing receivers. He brought physicality and proper hand use in coverage. He was a playmaker… He had 6 interceptions. He was an All America cornerback in both 2019 and 2020 He’s the 2 nd highest ranked corner in this draft.   A good performance in his pro day on 4/6 could vault him to #1. The Bad: While he c...
Post a Comment
Read more

Birds had to fly high to beat Motor City Roar, 38-35

  Game 1 thoughts… If anyone thinks the HBO show “Hard Knocks” has run its course after 20+ seasons, reference a raucous sold-out home crowd in the Motor City’s game 1 Eagle affair after being dead last in attendance last year!   The show was a credit to what the Lions are doing in building what will eventually be a winner, and it showed! The defense had 4 consecutive series that went- 3-and-out, 3-and-out, 3-and-out, Interception returned for TD.   Aside from those series, the defense was horrible, both before and after.   A combination of poor game planning, sloppy tackling, scheme deficiencies and poor coaching were to blame. Poor game planning: The strength of the Lions offense is their offensive line , and, commensurate with that, they indicated confidence in their terrific starting running back (D’Andre Swift).   Gannon’s defense played an attacking 4 man front that took the Eagles good quality defensive linemen out of position against the equally tal...
Post a Comment
Read more

No Miles times 2

  The Eagles had an opportunity to add a second Miles to their team yesterday (in addition to Miles Sanders).   Miles Boykin was a 6’4” 25 year old 3 rd round pick by the Baltimore Ravens in 2019, with terrific measurables (His spider chart showed top 21% receiving measurables in 10 of 11 metrics, top 10% for 3 of those).   He was not, however, a productive Raven receiver (over 3 years averaged 11 catches a year for 157 yards and 2 TD’s).   The Ravens cut him recently.     He was a physical player when drafted from  Notre Dame  in 2019.   He was projected to be a receiver that would require time to develop (Sounds like North Dakota receiver Chris Watson, projected to be a raw 2 nd or 3 rd round pick from North Dakota State).  He got time to develop as a Raven. So why bet on a Boykin that did not succeed: Baltimore has allegedly not been great at developing receivers in recent seasons Baltimore is a run heavy offense Boykin ha...
Post a Comment
Read more