Skip to main content

A Placebo named Deebo

 

One of the NFL’s more exciting players, All Pro wide receiver Deebo Samuel, a multi-purpose explosive talent, is demanding a trade from the San Francisco 49ers.  Samuel is a great player.  Should the Eagles “execute the required procedure” to trade for Deebo?

 

Oxford Languages defines PLACEBO this way:

  • a harmless pill or… procedure prescribed more for the psychological benefit to the patient than for any physiological effect.
  • a measure designed merely to calm or please someone.

 

I have no doubt Deebo Samuel would truly have a positive “physiological effect” on the Eagles.  Fact is, he’s a great player who would improve any team in the NFL.  But he would not be the best answer to building this squad towards Super Bowl contender.  The Eagles have a lot of holes.  For any team where Deebo is the “Cherry on the top” to help take a very good team to the Supe, that team should pursue him.  But for teams where the draft capital that it’d cost to get Deebo (2 first rounders?) AND the cap space required to sign him (25 million dollars)… Well, that cost is too high for the Birds, as currently composed (with, clearly multiple needs) to most advantageously complete their core. 

 

Eagles Lesson:  As previously mentioned (3/23- How to spend to Receive, 04/04- When to Overpay, 04/07- Who will Digg it?), the Eagles need to leverage their current enviable draft position to acquire 2 first round rookies, say, a rookie wide receiver who in a couple years projects to be 80% as good as Deebo, a rookie defensive player who will be a starter, and then spend the remaining cap space (that would have otherwise been occupied by Samuel) on a good defensive player.  That combination of 3 players will likely better help complete the Birds than Deebo, much as I or any fan would love to see him in Eagle green.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Derek Stingley Jr.

  First round draft prospect Derek Stingley Jr. is a paradox.   The LSU cornerback had an incredible freshman season, a clear top of the 1 st round talent even that young.   But since… not so much.   A combination of injuries and COVID have forced his stock down in this year’s NFL draft. Injuries have limited him to 10 games over 2 seasons since the 15 he played his freshman year.   And based upon past performance, opposing offenses have shied away from attacking him, thus yielding less tape to evaluate: The Good (from his freshman tape): He had speed, quickness and recovery speed. He had great coverage technique in breaking with opposing receivers. He brought physicality and proper hand use in coverage. He was a playmaker… He had 6 interceptions. He was an All America cornerback in both 2019 and 2020 He’s the 2 nd highest ranked corner in this draft.   A good performance in his pro day on 4/6 could vault him to #1. The Bad: While he c...
Post a Comment
Read more

Birds had to fly high to beat Motor City Roar, 38-35

  Game 1 thoughts… If anyone thinks the HBO show “Hard Knocks” has run its course after 20+ seasons, reference a raucous sold-out home crowd in the Motor City’s game 1 Eagle affair after being dead last in attendance last year!   The show was a credit to what the Lions are doing in building what will eventually be a winner, and it showed! The defense had 4 consecutive series that went- 3-and-out, 3-and-out, 3-and-out, Interception returned for TD.   Aside from those series, the defense was horrible, both before and after.   A combination of poor game planning, sloppy tackling, scheme deficiencies and poor coaching were to blame. Poor game planning: The strength of the Lions offense is their offensive line , and, commensurate with that, they indicated confidence in their terrific starting running back (D’Andre Swift).   Gannon’s defense played an attacking 4 man front that took the Eagles good quality defensive linemen out of position against the equally tal...
Post a Comment
Read more

No Miles times 2

  The Eagles had an opportunity to add a second Miles to their team yesterday (in addition to Miles Sanders).   Miles Boykin was a 6’4” 25 year old 3 rd round pick by the Baltimore Ravens in 2019, with terrific measurables (His spider chart showed top 21% receiving measurables in 10 of 11 metrics, top 10% for 3 of those).   He was not, however, a productive Raven receiver (over 3 years averaged 11 catches a year for 157 yards and 2 TD’s).   The Ravens cut him recently.     He was a physical player when drafted from  Notre Dame  in 2019.   He was projected to be a receiver that would require time to develop (Sounds like North Dakota receiver Chris Watson, projected to be a raw 2 nd or 3 rd round pick from North Dakota State).  He got time to develop as a Raven. So why bet on a Boykin that did not succeed: Baltimore has allegedly not been great at developing receivers in recent seasons Baltimore is a run heavy offense Boykin ha...
Post a Comment
Read more